Every year, in laboratories around the world, ‘scientists’ poison, torture and kill millions of defenceless animals in the name of ‘safety’. But, there’s nothing safe about ‘safety’ tests on animals! With poorer accuracy than many non-animal alternatives—it’s certainly not safe for the animals and it’s not safe for us.
These are some of the different animals that are known to have been used in product tests around the world:
Testing consumer products on animals doesn't happen in Australia, but this hasn't stopped big companies like Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Colgate-Palmolive and L'Oreal from torturing animals in other countries before sending their products down under for us to buy... In fact, before stocking our supermarket shelves, these cruel companies pay big bucks for thousands of animals to be poisoned, burnt and killed. Why would they do this? In an attempt to find out the toxicity of the chemicals that make up cosmetics, cleaning products, drugs, pesticides, foods and even packing materials.
Cruel companies expose animals to chemicals that may cause painful eye and skin irritation, developmental abnormalities, cancer and death. The pain from such tests can be excruciating, yet animals are typically not given pain relief, as the ‘scientists’ fear anesthetics could affect the toxicity of the chemicals being tested. So the animals are left to languish in pain.
Click on the tests below to find out more about each of the common tests performed on animals.
Many scientists have argued for a long time that animal tests are ineffective at ensuring products are safe for humans. All species differ significantly in their physiology. In fact, one international study found that LD50 tests in rats and mice could only predict toxicity in humans with 65% accuracy, as opposed to about 75% with cell-line tests (a non-animal test). So feeding a new shampoo to rats won’t guarantee that it’s safe for humans. And really, who eats shampoo anyway!?!
If that weren’t enough reason to end such tests right now, then the alternatives certainly are! Modern alternatives to product tests on animals are generally more accurate and many are quicker, and much cheaper. Computer models, cell cultures, and human studies should all make animal tests a thing of the past. But this won’t happen unless people vote at the supermarket.
Why should animals suffer and die for a new brand of lipstick or new laundry detergent? The fact is they don’t have to, and you can help stop this cruelty. Whether you need to glam up, clean up or wash up, you can do it without clocking up a death toll. Just say no to animal testing. Check out our Cruelty-Free Shopping Guide to find out how easy it is to look great and help animals!
Millions of rodents are forced to endure painful tests every year in the name of product testing.
Dogs are also used in product tests. Beagles are a common choice by researchers due to their typically gentle and friendly nature.
Day 6 of an LD50 (Lethal Dose 50%) acute toxicity poison test. This beagle dog is convulsing, has great difficulty in breathing and is unable to stand. Discharge and bleeding from the eyes are visible.
In an ld50 toxicity experiment, this cat was being poisoned to death by the ingredients used in a household product.
To test the effects of cigarettes, dogs have been involved in experiments where they are forced to inhale cigarette smoke.
Rabbits have chemicals dripped into their eyes and are locked into devices that stop them from attempting to rub their eyes clean. They are left to languish for days on end as the chemicals slowly burn their sensitive eye tissue.
The draize test can leave rabbits blinded.
The degree of eye damage caused by the draize test is rated on a scale from 0 - 110. The highest rating indicates that the eye was completely destroyed.
Skin irritation tests are common and involve chemicals being applied to a bare patch of skin. This can cause severe chemical burns, gaping wounds, and bleeding.
Some animals endure the pain of multiple tests. Those who are still alive but no longer useful for further testing are killed.
Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: 'Because the animals are like us.' Ask the experimenters why it is morally OK to experiment on animals, and the answer is: 'Because the animals are not like us.' Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction.