I see everyone here chooses not to eat meat because of morals. But thats wrong, nature doesnt work by morals. Would you like all animals to die from hunger based on morals?
Sorry, but morals are wrong? But surely you yourself are using the argument that factory farming is morally wrong, that the animals aren't treated well. The fact is that if people had no morals about eating animals, then the animals would probably be in even worse situations than they are now.
Society is dependent upon morals, imagine a world without them!
You can't take an argument and twist it to suit your means. We do not need to kill animals, we can easily survive without eating them, therefore eating them is purely for our pleasure - and that is wrong.
I actually think we need more morals, not less, the world would be a better place!
To have life you eat life. Plants are life, animals are life we eat them to survive, morals don't exsist in natures world.
And really humans don't exist in natures world either. We are so far removed from nature in our air conditioned houses, with machines and technology, driving around in cars, wearing clothes, buying our food neatly packaged from the supermarket - a lot of people don't have the first clue about anything to do with nature.
Plus you're wrong, we don't need to eat animals to survive. Unfortunately most people are like you, under the illusion that they do need animals to survive, which is why animals are crammed into factory farms like they are now.
As you say, plants are life - we can easily survive, and thrive, on a diet based on them.
Because man has developed morals -one being vegitarianisim, that doesnt mean humans have to adjust our way of life because of an idea.
So if you apply that philosophy to other things, then sure it's ok to kill people you don't like, reproduced with whomever you like, even family, even if its against their will, steal whatever you feel like, roam the streets naked.
Thankfully, some humans are able to realise that there is right and wrong to their actions. I say some because some live outside of these rules, which is where many of society's problems come from.
If we didn't have morals society would collapse.
I listen to my body and when im hungry I eat what my body needs and thats protein, vitimins etc...
You may not realise, but many plant foods, in fact most foods contain protein. In fact plant foods contain a lot more vitamins than animal foods.
If you make a choice based on morals thats fine i respect that decision, but humans will always eat meat. So if you want the better care of animals wouldn't you want Australians to have independent farming not factory farming?
Factory farming is torture, pigs are living in tight cages, chickens are diseased, wings are mutated, big business doesnt care for their life.
No farming cares for their life, if they did then they wouldn't steal if from them.
Independent farming is diffrent. Animals dont live in torture, they are healthy and they run around free, they have given a healthy life to live just like us. But In the end they will be eaten, weather its by a human, cat, racoon or fox. Thats the essence of life.
Again, it is simply not necessary, humans don't need to eat other animals, it's not the essence of life to keep animals confined (whether it be in a stall or a field), to cram them in a truck, to transport them to a slaughterhouse, to hang them upside-down by a hook, to kill and dismember them and package them neatly into plastic containers and to truck their dismembered parts to large supermarkets.
It's not natural, or the essence of life to remove babies from their mothers so we can steal their milk and drink it. Drinking milk from another species is not natural and certainly not the essence of life.