Reading last night, I came across something which reminded me of this thread. Although this book isn't scholarly, it is well referenced and, I assume, accurate (at least with its use of contemporary source material). Although it's about an era that is many thousands of years removed from the 'Paleo' it does go some way to demonstrating how different factory-farmed animals are to early-era farmed animals.
Talking about the occasions in which meat (beef, mutton and pork in particular) was eaten:
'The Year 1000', Robert Lacey and Danny Danzinger said:
The relatively small amounts of fat on all these meats would be viewed by modern nutritionists with quite a kindly eye. Saturated fat, the source of cholesterol with its related contemporary health problems, is a problem of the intensively reared factory-farmed animals of recent years, with their overabundant "scientific" diets and their lack of exercise. All Anglo-Saxon animals were free range, and the Anglo-Saxons would have been shocked at the idea of ploughing land to produce animal feed. Ploughland was for feeding humans. So farm animals were lean and rangey, their meat containing three times as much protein as fat. With modern, intensively reared animals that ratio is often reversed.
If the nutritional composition of animals has changed that significantly in the last thousand years - imagine how much it has changed in the last ten thousand...