Animals Australia Unleashed
Change the World Who Cares? Videos Take Action! The Animals Community Forum Shop Blog Display
1 2 3
Your E-Mail: O Password:
Login Help     |     Join for Free!     |     Hide This

Post a Reply

Asylum Seekers.

...and the recent boat tragedy.

51 - 60 of 160 posts   3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9  


z1 z1 VIC Posts: 535
51 18 Dec 2010
two things no one gives a shit about

1. the people who taking legal means to seek asylum who dont have thousands of dollars to pay criminals to illegally enter Australia. They stuck in Indonesia in less than ideal conditions, not a single aussie is batting for them. They have no means and no way.

2. The environment. People here saying that we need to expand our population either know absolutely nothing about the environment or dont care as long as they can be "pure vegans".
And the others sound like socialist dictators.

Land that "is not being used" is the most disgusting concept of all. What it is really saying is that we should destroy and exploit all "unused" land.

I support a small CONTROLLED number of refugees. possibly 200 a year on top of about 200 immigrants. If our conditions improve in the future we could increase that number.

To put it into another context, would you people like to see Fiji destroyed? Their culture and way of life destroyed? Hey, they have heaps of room why should they be so selfish, we could build thousands of flats, create better transport systems. Hopefully those racist Fijians will be bred out of existence.
This is basically the socialist agenda expect only targeted at European nations.
And for the record, yes, Fiji is being destroyed.
ReplyQuote

tarkine tarkine Iran Posts: 296
52 18 Dec 2010
Aaron, our population is ageing, which is one of the reasons why we need immigration to maintain a sustainable demographic, to keep people in employment and to produce food, provide health care, education and other goods & services we need as a nation to survive - the average age of Australians would rise to about 65 in quick time if we only accepted 400 migrants a year, and we would have almost zero doctors and nurses to look after us.

We can have a sensible debate about where net immigration should be, between 100,000 - 300,000. The demographers who have done stacks of research on this reckon that 170,000 is about the figure we should aim for to make sure there are enough people of working age in this country to support our retired parents and grandparents. Are you going to send them back out to work? Otherwise, you're welcome to pay for all their pensions by yourself... I'd be taking my friends and moving to New Zealand.

And on your first point, showing compassion for refugees who arrive in Australia doesn't mean we care any less about those who are in other countries. Incidentally, the refugees sitting around in Malaysia and Indonesia are "illegal" too, by your own definition.
ReplyQuote

Courtney_1 Courtney_1 VIC Posts: 335
53 18 Dec 2010
sarahbentvelzen said:
Courtney_ said:
sarahbentvelzen said:
Courtney_ said:
Kirrilly said:
Courtney_ said:
I think that we are already pretty over-populated and personally, what happened was horrible but I don't nessecarily agree with all of them coming in here.
I mean sure, most of us did too - But they're going to come here and probaly get a home, money from the government and a good job, a big upgrade from their country while people like us are still trying to pay off houses after many years, etc.

My opinion.
Being over-populated is not a matter of opinion, we are or we aren't. And we aren't.
Why would the government just give them a house? They aren't suddenly rich when they come here, they're just safer.. And I wouldn't consider driving a taxi or running a 7-11 as a good job, they have to take what they can get which usually isn't much..
-_-
The roads, the traffic - They are always packed with people, escipally where I live and if we continue to let people come in the country like this, the problem is going to get worse. Besides, houses are being built everywhere in Whittelsea, which was all country - It's destroying the land, environment and a place for where the kangaroos live.
And it's funny because most people that come into my school who lived overseas have more money than anyone here would have. The government gives them money.
The traffic problem isn't due to asylum seekers though. We have a traffic problem because we're idiots. We didn't plan our roads properly, and no one understands what car-pooling, or 'taking public transport' means. Instead of buying your child a car, get them a bike. If you work in the city, take public transport. It's quite simple, but we are so spoiled that we need to drive to the city with the air con blasting and music blaring.
I'm not saying that it's de to the asylum seekers, I'm just saying the more people we let into this country, the bigger the problem is going to get. And it's much easier for most people to get into their car and drive to work than to walk to the nearest train station and catch the train to work - Not many people are going to see public transport as an option when they have their own car.
If we don't fix the problem ourselves, ie get rid of our cars, etc then we are going to blame 'over-population' and asylum seekers.
So what will happen when people start ditching their cars and trying to take public transport to work? They'll get even more crowded than they already are.
ReplyQuote

Clud Clud VIC Posts: 1559
54 18 Dec 2010
Courtney_ said:
So what will happen when people start ditching their cars and trying to take public transport to work? They'll get even more crowded than they already are.
You run more buses, trains, trams etc.
More demand more public transport.
Simple.
ReplyQuote

Clud Clud VIC Posts: 1559
55 18 Dec 2010
@ Aaron it is called building up not out! Australia can take on a lot more people, not loads but it's Australias right to take in more immigrants because we can.
Have you put foreign countries environments into your mind when thinking about this? So many European and Asian coutries are digging more and more into their environment to pack in more people.
ReplyQuote

JMort JMort VIC Posts: 248
56 18 Dec 2010
It's cool how the biggest threads are all to do with human issues (Religion, Refugees etc).

I guess it's because we all agree on animal issues mostly.

Hm, debates are fun.

I bet if we took some parts of one side of the argument and blended it with some parts of the other side, we would get the best solution, because there is some ridiculously good logic in both sides.
ReplyQuote

z1 z1 VIC Posts: 535
57 18 Dec 2010
tarkine said:
Aaron, our population is ageing, which is one of the reasons why we need immigration to maintain a sustainable demographic, to keep people in employment and to produce food, provide health care, education and other goods & services we need as a nation to survive - the average age of Australians would rise to about 65 in quick time if we only accepted 400 migrants a year, and we would have almost zero doctors and nurses to look after us.
more like to provide cheap ethnic labor for greedy corporations at the expense of aussie kids who cant compete with foreigners who are prepared to work for a pittance and never take holidays.
Globalization is the evil that caused this, as a result white western/european people have stopped breeding in order to maintain a way a life that we have come accustomed to, taking up two jobs, renting and huge loans. And things only continue to get worse.
We need only to look to other countries to see the trouble caused by short term boosts to the economy. Immigration is not easing the burden on anyone.

tarkine said:
We can have a sensible debate about where net immigration should be, between 100,000 - 300,000. The demographers who have done stacks of research on this reckon that 170,000 is about the figure we should aim for to make sure there are enough people of working age in this country to support our retired parents and grandparents. Are you going to send them back out to work? Otherwise, you're welcome to pay for all their pensions by yourself... I'd be taking my friends and moving to New Zealand.
You're getting your wish, we are getting thousands of immigrants. You might be happy to know that the mornington peninsula is about to be destroyed to expand cheap housing which is dependent on huge highways, meaning more cars, more pollution, more congestion.

tarkine said:
And on your first point, showing compassion for refugees who arrive in Australia doesn't mean we care any less about those who are in other countries. Incidentally, the refugees sitting around in Malaysia and Indonesia are "illegal" too, by your own definition.
All I ever hear about is boat people and how terrible their countries are with not a single mention of the exact same people who now have to wait even longer because they dont have to cash  to buy a boat ride. They are voiceless and ignored.
They are not illegal when they finally come to Australia because they have been legally processed.
ReplyQuote

z1 z1 VIC Posts: 535
58 18 Dec 2010
Callum said:
@ Aaron it is called building up not out! Australia can take on a lot more people, not loads but it's Australias right to take in more immigrants because we can.
Have you put foreign countries environments into your mind when thinking about this? So many European and Asian coutries are digging more and more into their environment to pack in more people.
it's called living like rats.
ReplyQuote

...2 ...2 WA Posts: 2307
59 18 Dec 2010
JMort said:
It's cool how the biggest threads are all to do with human issues (Religion, Refugees etc).

I guess it's because we all agree on animal issues mostly.

Hm, debates are fun.

I bet if we took some parts of one side of the argument and blended it with some parts of the other side, we would get the best solution, because there is some ridiculously good logic in both sides.
I know, it's awesome. I WAS participating before, but both sides have raised such sound arguments that I can no longer decide where I stand.

For now, i'm going to just sit back and listen. You know, if we sat here and riddled out all of these little issues until we came to a single solution, this forum could solve all the world's problems. We're quite an intelligent, rational bunch.
ReplyQuote

Courtney_1 Courtney_1 VIC Posts: 335
60 18 Dec 2010
Callum said:
Courtney_ said:
So what will happen when people start ditching their cars and trying to take public transport to work? They'll get even more crowded than they already are.
You run more buses, trains, trams etc.
More demand more public transport.
Simple.
I'm defiently not to keen on taking public transport where everyone else leans their heads on the seat, has s*it on their shoes or probaly pick their nose and wipes it in places.
If we're going to have more people in this country, personally I'd rather it to be the English/Britiish or so because they basically settled this country. Besides, us, as Aussies, I mean the ones that have been here for a few generations are getting over-run by the foreigners. The Aussies are becoming a minority group in this country and the government isn't doing barely enough.
ReplyQuote

 [ 3 ]  [ 4 ]  [ 5 ]  [ 6 ]  [ 7 ]  [ 8 ]  [ 9 ] 

www.unleashed.org.au