I understand what he meant. I'm referring to myself here, and meant that I can't EVER call saving a life a dilemma for me. 'Ever' for me includes whether or not the person will continue to support the meat industry. I want to help all living things. This includes omni human animals, as well as animals. I understand people have a dilemma and that is fine, but for me I dont and I couldnt ever possibly justify the aforementioned arguments in my head and stop donating. Each to their own.
I understand your mentality, although I have to ask: Would you save Hitler? Even if there wa sa 98% chance he would continue the genocide he started? After all, you are just saving a life..
I do see that on the face of it, yes, you are saving a life. But as soon as you just look deeper then that, you actually aren't, you're actually aiding someone CAUSE harm. It's like becoming a vegetarian, because on the face of it, you aren't causing harm. But when you look a little deeper into the dairy and egg industries, you're still causing a great amount of harm.