Animals Australia Unleashed
Change the World Who Cares? Videos Take Action! The Animals Community Forum Shop Blog Display
1 2 3
Your E-Mail: O Password:
Login Help     |     Join for Free!     |     Hide This

Post a Reply

organ donation

61 - 70 of 191 posts   4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10  


PaulV PaulV NSW Posts: 47
61 6 Apr 2011
Chewie said:
PaulV said:
Chewy, let me ask it from a different perspective. If the little pig in your photo came to you to beg for its life, which it definately would if it could speak human and said "if you donate your organs to your dad he will live and in a months time I will be killed to feed him, please let me live dont donate your organs" how would you respond to that cute little guy?
It wouldn't have been killed solely to feed him -- it would have been killed anyway if it was at a factory farm and I wouldn't have been able to save its life (but I could have saved my dad's life if I gave him an organ -- therein lies the difference).

But regardless, to answer your question, I would respond like this: I don't have the opportunity to donate my organs to my dad because he's already dead. But if I could have donated an organ to him while alive (i.e. a kidney) I would have done so, so I could have been given the opportunity to not grow up without a father, which was INCREDIBLY hard for myself and my family.
animals are only produced at quantites to supply the demand, this is a unversally accepted economic principle, the business would go broke if they continued to supply quantites to smaller demands. You can read more about it at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand#Demand_curve_shifts
so as you can see from the supply demand laws, yes, the pigs that have their own lives, personalities and wish to live would not be killed if there were not the demand even if it is only one person. Every single person that buys a product is catered to. I grudgingly studided economics 101 at uni and it is the very first thing they talk about.

I wasnt aware of your personal situation so i'm sorry if that brought up any unpleasant thoughts. My point was about supplying organs to people who you love, that you are debating to supply organs too.
so is your answer to the pig " bad luck, you must die"?
ReplyQuote

PaulV PaulV NSW Posts: 47
62 6 Apr 2011
Chewie said:
There was a discussion on the counter a while ago, and a lot of people concluded that they didn't think it necessarily means they've saved x amount of animals. I tend to agree with this in the short term. In many instances, me being vegan has meant more meat has gone to waste (e.g. being accidentally served a meat dish at a restaurant when I asked for a veg one, taking one bite and realising and them throwing it out). The amount of meat being thrown out at Woolworths and Coles doesn't appear to be slowing down either unfortunately. But nothing would ever change if we didn't think we could make a difference, so I agree that collectively, in the long-term, a huge increase in the amount of vegetarians will slow demand. I believe that even meat eaters can make a difference by reducing the amount of meat they eat, and by having meat free days, which many meat eaters are doing nowadays.

I just don't think allowing one person to die will make a huge difference to this demand at all, and I think it's completely unfair to not give them the opportunity at life (to which they could actually be an amazing person and a vegan anyway, or become one) on the account that they may eat meat.

"I think its just normal to not eat meat, like its normal to not murder humans."

Actually, evolution will say that eating meat IS normal. That of course doesn't mean it's right these days, but the normality of it is the reason why many people find it hard to turn vegetarian.
ReplyQuote

PaulV PaulV NSW Posts: 47
63 6 Apr 2011
PaulV said:
Chewie said:
There was a discussion on the counter a while ago, and a lot of people concluded that they didn't think it necessarily means they've saved x amount of animals. I tend to agree with this in the short term. In many instances, me being vegan has meant more meat has gone to waste (e.g. being accidentally served a meat dish at a restaurant when I asked for a veg one, taking one bite and realising and them throwing it out). The amount of meat being thrown out at Woolworths and Coles doesn't appear to be slowing down either unfortunately. But nothing would ever change if we didn't think we could make a difference, so I agree that collectively, in the long-term, a huge increase in the amount of vegetarians will slow demand. I believe that even meat eaters can make a difference by reducing the amount of meat they eat, and by having meat free days, which many meat eaters are doing nowadays.

I just don't think allowing one person to die will make a huge difference to this demand at all, and I think it's completely unfair to not give them the opportunity at life (to which they could actually be an amazing person and a vegan anyway, or become one) on the account that they may eat meat.

"I think its just normal to not eat meat, like its normal to not murder humans."

Actually, evolution will say that eating meat IS normal. That of course doesn't mean it's right these days, but the normality of it is the reason why many people find it hard to turn vegetarian.
I refute the idea completely that evolution says anything of the sort. we have been farming and eating animals for far less time than we have been evolving. evolution happens over a scale of hundreds of thousands to millions of years. that is not how long humans have been eating meat. all of the physiology of your body has been designed (by evolution) to eat plant based material. starting at our plant grinding teeth, non-fanged teeth, the fruit digesting enzymes in our saliva, the increased lenght of our digestive tract to break down plant cell walls, our soft supply unclawed hands for manipulating fruits and seeds, not tearing flesh from bones, the list goes on and on.
Humans have been eating meat since we moved away from the tropical fruity zones in the time frame of tens of thousands of years, moving to colder climates we were forced to find other sources of calories, so we ate (against our bodies design) animals. to deal with the flesh we have to salt, spice and cook the natural tastes out of it because the idea of eating a dead bloodied stomach or bowel sickens us. It is not natural or part of evolution at all.
and the reason it is difficult to go vegan is not one of genetics it is a learned behavious, we are forced meat as infants, our supermarkets up until recently have had few if any vegan options. the meat, dairy and pharmacuetical companies are the biggest companies on this planet it is in their interest to make you feel like it is normal and natural but it is far from the truth
ReplyQuote

Kirrilly Kirrilly VIC Posts: 2092
64 6 Apr 2011
I respect people's right to choose not to donate their organs, but I can't possibly comprehend why they wouldn't.
ReplyQuote

PaulV PaulV NSW Posts: 47
65 6 Apr 2011
Kirrilly said:
I respect people's right to choose not to donate their organs, but I can't possibly comprehend why they wouldn't.
there are 7 pages of reasons why not here, but basically if you offer your organs to someone that eats animals they will continue to do so.
ReplyQuote

Chewie Chewie NSW Posts: 521
66 6 Apr 2011
PaulV said:
Chewie said:
PaulV said:
Chewy, let me ask it from a different perspective. If the little pig in your photo came to you to beg for its life, which it definately would if it could speak human and said "if you donate your organs to your dad he will live and in a months time I will be killed to feed him, please let me live dont donate your organs" how would you respond to that cute little guy?
It wouldn't have been killed solely to feed him -- it would have been killed anyway if it was at a factory farm and I wouldn't have been able to save its life (but I could have saved my dad's life if I gave him an organ -- therein lies the difference).

But regardless, to answer your question, I would respond like this: I don't have the opportunity to donate my organs to my dad because he's already dead. But if I could have donated an organ to him while alive (i.e. a kidney) I would have done so, so I could have been given the opportunity to not grow up without a father, which was INCREDIBLY hard for myself and my family.
animals are only produced at quantites to supply the demand, this is a unversally accepted economic principle, the business would go broke if they continued to supply quantites to smaller demands. You can read more about it at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand#Demand_curve_shifts
so as you can see from the supply demand laws, yes, the pigs that have their own lives, personalities and wish to live would not be killed if there were not the demand even if it is only one person. Every single person that buys a product is catered to. I grudgingly studided economics 101 at uni and it is the very first thing they talk about.

I wasnt aware of your personal situation so i'm sorry if that brought up any unpleasant thoughts. My point was about supplying organs to people who you love, that you are debating to supply organs too.
so is your answer to the pig " bad luck, you must die"?
No, my answer to the pig is described in my last post.

I understand the supply demand laws, but all I'm saying is if this hypothetical pig was born into a factory farm -- which in this circumstance it was -- it would have unfortunately died even if one meat eater died at the same time as well, because it was already in a factory farm. For the sake of this argument, yes, the supply would have marginally decreased, but not immediately for the animals already at the farm.

And had my father lived, I'm sure his attitudes to eating pigs may have changed. My partner and my family rarely (if EVER) eat pig because they know how much I love them, and how upset I get when I see pig on a dinner table. One can be a meat eater but still make a difference to that supply demand chain.
ReplyQuote

Kirrilly Kirrilly VIC Posts: 2092
67 6 Apr 2011
Eh, I ate animals once.
ReplyQuote

Chewie Chewie NSW Posts: 521
68 6 Apr 2011
Personally, I find the "I don't want to give my organs to a meat eater" argument ridiculous. Like Kirrilly, I too was a meat eater once. I'd hate to think that I would have died because a self righteous vegan refused to give their organs once they were dead, because of the possibility they'd go to a meat eater. Not only have I become vegan, but many people I know are also on their way because of my influence.
ReplyQuote

PaulV PaulV NSW Posts: 47
69 6 Apr 2011
self righteous? Not eating animals  is right. No self about it. and just because you did something bad once doesnt excuse people doing it now.
ReplyQuote

PaulV PaulV NSW Posts: 47
70 6 Apr 2011
in the United states alone 9 billion animals a year are killed for consumption. One is too many. It must stop now, there is no time. If you were one of those animals in the line up, watching, smelling, sensing the imminent death of themselves and their friends around them you would feel more urgent about it. Humans lives are not more important than animals. I would not give my organs to a paedophile if there was a chance he would one day stop raping children, its now I'm worried about.
ReplyQuote

 [ 4 ]  [ 5 ]  [ 6 ]  [ 7 ]  [ 8 ]  [ 9 ]  [ 10 ] 

www.unleashed.org.au