I like the fact that at least it is advocating good behavior...
The idea of "indigo children" is advocating nothing other than delusions of grandeur. How is wallowing in their self-perceived greatness improving anything? Where in this thread, or the article link, has anyone actually mentioned making the world better in any way other than being "sent to this world" to do so? (make better how? sent by who? from where? got any memories of that?) All people are able to help make the world a better place, the difference between us and indigo adults is that we don't need to glorify ourselves or tell everyone how special and meaningful we are for our mundane abilities while doing so.
One thing I find amusing though, is that the person who actually made up the term doesn't believe indigo children are special, either. In 1982 she wrote "The Indigo label describes the energy pattern of human behavior which exists in over 95% of the children born in the last 10 years … This phenomena is happening globally and eventually the Indigos will replace all other colors." So indigo people are, by the inventor's definition, completely average people who happened to be born in a particular time period wherein their "energy pattern" is the norm.
[/quote]
The whole idea of these of 'indego' people is very similar to the beleifs of many religions; some believe they are sent here to improve the world and to learn something they may not have learnt the last time and that the universe or god or whomever it is of worhship has some devine meaning for each of us... this is just their way of seeing it, who are you to judge and ridicule them?
She is talking about the 'energy pattern of peoples behaviours - thus meaning good or bad behavioured people', while yes you are somewhat right that her words do not lay it out very clear but im sure if you were to continue reading that you would fing that the evident conclusion is that, it is a form of a new era; my opinion is that it represents the new generation of the reformed culture or society (eg: the era of slavery) is it not that they new generation was born thus overtime changing the world to be a better place (even though slavery still happens today it is somewhat an improvement than that of the past... and
even though most people in todays world would have a slave if given the opportunity thus the majority of people dont even care about fair trade which is technically the same thing
and pass it off as oh well at least it isnt me, it is considered bad by society thus why it is
'somewhat' an obsolete thing... And i do believe that people have taken it upon themsevle to see it as a special thing whereas the writer/inventor was just expressing what she
believes it to be and hasnt specified her stance on if she sees it as 'special'... but is it not a special thing for a new era, ... a new way of life... a new world where it is safe and fair for all (which clearly you must think it is because your on a forum for it)... this is what it is about... But a great writter leaves their emotional opinion out of it but i could imaging that one does not write such things unless they believe in it...
[Admin note: Edited. Please stay on topic, rather than focusing on individuals.]
i might be one 
