PETA???

All P!nk every said was that when she did the anti-mulesing stuff she wasn't completely informed or understanding of the situation.
She still supports PETA massively.

I feel that's a wacky exaggeration.

'I probably could have been a lot more researched, on my own. That's the lesson I'm taking from this. My message was, in my mind, boycott animal cruelty - not an entire industry, not Australia, obviously, because it's my favorite country.', Pink said in her apology, aired on Nine Network television.

have you guys seen PETAs proposed Superbowl Ad? I'm officially ashamed to have Peta representing the umbrella of people that are vegan/vegetarian  

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/31/peta-super-bowl-ad_n_816341.html

anti-feminist, innappropriate etc it will get male attention at the time but why on earth does this kind of stuff make anyone want to go be veg?!

The first thing I have to say is: WTF?!
Why would they think that that ad would help!? It just makes us who are Veg look stupid.
I don't understand why they would think that would get people to want to go Vegetarian/Vegan. Crazy.

I totally agree! Its pathetic! This is why people dont take PETA seriously. You say PETA people go "oh jeezz.. not those idiots"

I completely agree Hayley. Sure, letting the dogs out of the cages all together apparently wasn't that well thought out but PETA aren't the 'bad guys' here. Should dogs be shown like inanimate objects? Definetly not.

Congratulations to PETA for doing for what most of us do not have the resources - or guts- to do.

the last superbowl ad was to raunchy to be aired, they put forward 3 million dollars for it to be aired.....I don't think that's a good use of donations, makes me wonder if they have marketting team at all coz the seem to only be marketing horny men

Shrewd aren't they?

Produce an advert they know won't get broadcast due to it's offensive nature. Offer lots of money to broadcast it, safe in the knowledge that it will be refused, and they sit back while newspapers round the world give free publicity to a Go Vegetarian message.

Genius.

I have heard this too, and it's horrible, but I still believe PETA to be a great organisation.
According to petakillsanimals.com, peta has killed 21, 651 animals since 1998. (From the chart, not the text.) That's thirteen years! These animals are sick and there are simply not enough people adopting dogs for homes to be found for all of them.
While it is horrible for these animals to be killed, you can't ignore the other good PETA does. They are the most recognisable animal rights organisation in the world, they have wonderful ad campaigns and informative websites that help many people make the switch to a more compassionate lifestyle.
They have petitions that immediately target companies that abuse animals, from DKNY to Ringling Bros - and they get results! Lipton Tea agreed to stop testing on animals, the University of Texas at Dallas stopped performing neuroscience experiments on rats. When PETA targeted fast-food companies, Temple Grandin (the most powerful welfare scientist in America and designer of more than half the country's cattle slaughter facilities) said she saw more welfare improvements in one year than in the previous 30.
What other organisation can say they've done all this?
PETA isn't perfect, but they manage to do a hell of a lot.