I'm glad to be proven wrong about things and it's my own fault for not seeking out the other side of the debate

.
Apparently they do use native forest timber. They say it's the leftovers from other companies/industries making furniture, building materials and the like who use a bit less than 7,800 hectares of native forest each year, which is replanted.
While they aren't the primary users of the native forest and are just using the waste, they are technically still using native forest timber, hence why the confusion has arisen?
On a bit of a tangent, I guess that alternatives to buying new paper could be to buy recycled paper. Apparently there are a few brands that create paper that is made out of 100% post consumer waste and isn't rebleached.