all i can see is its very easy to be morally correct when it doesnt financially affect you.
and it can be very easy to look the other way and feign ignorance when the money rolls in.
One extreme to another this is why you have arguments. Animal libos cant have middle ground its your right or im wrong. No facts or stats will suffice all you want is for a vego world and if people lose there livelhoods in the process then who cares.
See now I find it interesting that you start this paragraph by attacking someone for bringing up a valid point, which you think is extreme. Then you end your paragraph with your own extremes.
You have a (somewhat) valid point - what happens to the farmers? Well, no they probably don't deserve to lose everything they have (if indeed they will as you suggest) despite the fact they actively participate in a process that takes from animals everything. Is the answer to turn away and undo all the good that has so far happened? I don't think so. Highly counter-productive and would just confirm everyone's worst fears that Australia would sell itself out for cash. The Government should be working with, and helping, these farmers to find an alternative means to make money (not through animal cruelty, directly or indirectly).
I find it highly insulting, as should any member of the human race, that someone would suggest that there are only two options - all or nothing (and as you've so rightly pointed out, we shouldn't stick only to extremes). Surely we are much more creative and innovative than that?
I mean - that IS what sets us apart from animals isn't it?