everyone isn't an idiot though... and it is easier for idiots to obviously not be confined by the laws of common decency and accepted practice so the only people you're inflicting this opinion upon... are all of those who don't need it to be 'difficult' to have a child, to 'force' them to be what?? more compassionate human beings.. this topic is starting to get stupid
I am merely saying that there is responsibility in raising a child, whether that child is adopted or not. Being a responsible parent, to me, seems to be judged more/harsher where the parent is adopting and raising that child, rather than in raising a child that the parent bore. If it is essential for someone to wait ten years to be considered acceptable or responsible enough to have a child, why aren't we compelled to feel the same way with other people, those who can have children, who don't sit through lengthy procedures, and get caught in red tape, etc.
If it were up to me I'd encourage soon-to-be-parents to take some sort of course on learning responsibility. I don't think everyone is an idiot, but there are idiots that have children. Some people think it's child abuse to raise their child vegan while some vegans think it's child abuse to raise their child eating meat. We are all guilty of questioning the methods in which children are raised.
I know a couple who have a child and the mother is pregnant with their second child. They are living off one pay check (casual work). To me that is not good enough when raising two children.
BTW, I believe you misinterpreted what I said: 'any idiot can have a child'. I didn't mean 'ANY idiot', I meant 'any IDIOT'.
Laws are put in place sigh freedoms in mind..
A person's right to bare a child... is a quintessential part of being.
Thus to put any rule on such a fundamentally instinctive process is overly offensive and detrimental to the wills and minds of all humans. There are laws and I mean ARE, in most all adverse instances you 'breathe light to' which can be enacted to remove a child from such situations, but to prevent such an occurance (as birth from sex) without implied constraints on ALL humans.
Well... there is no generalized law which can be enforced more than common decency or accepted practice. which would bring justice to all faculties of human conscious existence we call life...
This be as well known as it is.... this topic is getting stupid.
Your so called sense of a frown upon those raising orphans is misguided by an often subversive medium and or misplaced by way of biased experience led reason.
Considering it is the same force which binds the non-physical laws, such as common sense and the aforementioned, that if enacted... your suggestions of a physical infliction to be put over humanity... wouldn't be necessary, nor are they.
You anger at a system which is that being spat on by those who enact these crimes, like living entirely as a leech to it? Yet you are pointing these people out as a flaw of the system.... like those laws being observed to be broken, to be those flaws... are not actually put in place to enact the purpose you seek.
Divert your misanthropy to a faceless authority? Or take it maybe... that the laws in place to protect orphans are in place for those very qualities once again, but this time it is you who spit on them.. as if they are meant to be put there as an insult to humanity... spit on them as if they are inflicted upon you... fight for your right to be treated specifically...
fore someone's anger has been taken into consideration by this faceless authority... in the past... or rest assured, there wouldn't be regulations abroad on the standards necessary for adoption... and how these standards commanded by class and manner... people are bound to be a certain way, a generic, civilized member or 'sow'-'ciety', or at least are more likely to be put through the system, (although possibly far less fit) than a hippy... is your concern?
so your solution is to inflict upon more that which you feel inflicted upon yourself, even though hypothetically... or in theory, or by experience...
this to me.... is the problem in the world... this to me is the justifications people use to overt the laws of common decency and accepted practice and live unaffected by them... and live in the shadow of their own silhouette, that anger.. expressed by a world which has not caused it... and who causes it by doing so. (and thus can be said their own)
because I cannot tell if you're being ironic or honest
because common sense can be manipulated, merely to pretend an intention behind common decency, merely to pretend accepted practice to be the epitome of cliched sickness...
I see noone dictate conformity and constraints, more than those whom fear of it.
p.s.
say it is up to you then... encourage parents to be well...
because as idealistically it way seem a blessing... a course is 1. insulting and 2. soon to be seen another excuse to waste paper and occupy space, once established (I should add then, self complimented upon the initiative of) taking someone's emotive lacking the motivation, advice - again people feeling they own something by identifying with it... you take a responsibility that isn't your own.. pass it on for someone else to resolve... always flippantly passed on (as if it were a lucky coin flipped for chance and the government were the powers that be, which decide its' fate) to the same company which has made a business out of never finishing a job... they happily would accept... (you don't realize the delay is them substantiating, legislating away liability for profiting and doing everything You and you{counter} want) attempting to work out the inconsolable difference and knowingly trying to create a movement which cannot be done in the medium of choice... thus... the economy is result of work which is maintenance, when economy is society and all work is maintenance causing work is thus growth... "the more breaks the better"...1. because we're destine to be broke this way and then are destine to be rich... because simply...to all be human and equal in theory, then the poorer we are, the more wealth of worth there is to be rich, to have the luxury of being human and thus deserving human rights: divide a pyramid how every many times, but there is only ever room for I at the top, wewewewe until I am rich 2. what else is there to stop us from being in heaven, but to make a hell out of the Earth.
with out obvious prospect depletion of the planet, would a counter movement be able to identify itself to do the exact opposite, thus essentially splitting like a cell that alienates itself.. "I don't want to be here, I don't want to die, I don't want to live in this world, but I don't want to stop living off it"... growing like a cancer.
A well oiled machine, considering the emotive is planted just like a seed of doubt and harvested with the assurance, noone has the will to profit from negativity via their own positivety, which would be utilized in the solution; tended to by the instilled assumption that people are prejudice as a whole and a whole being a society, it is doomed to see itself as a mirror and self destruct at every available pause, being a blessing or a cure, thus re-incarnating itself every time...without. like it looks to see a conscious beauty, which is destroyed in-between glances and vision.
is the whole world as an organism of people living in angst... destroying the nutrient of the earth so that it may cripple the earth into stagnant longevity, rather than living out a brilliant finitecy. (quality of being finite, in context of being ideal vs perfect)
précis
to anger at the world for not having what you have,
is to anger at the government for not making the world Australia
and to see Australia as the creation of a government
is to live blinded by misanthrope
woops I meant, you know it is wrong to force someone to change,
so why is it alright to force someone else to enforce such a thing
or rather, people are the problem, but not the cause?
preemptive:
I don't have the right to identify you're inflicting anger by expressing it senselessly without seeming offensive
yet i'm sure you'd feel you more than have the right to 'speculate aimlessly' i'm on crack without seeming defensive
truths need more rights because wrongs have them all
analogy:
people could see us splitting as adversaries of adversity
when essentially we are the same side of the thing -- anonymous
not agreeing entirely doesn't make things in opposition
Alike people and government, society and poverty; 1 and 3 are by and by a difference used to gauge value of the whole metric system, first and third -- world; gold and bronze -- age) and spoil is the currency payed as wages, when oil is the currency playing off wagers. "I bet you all the oil in the well, (which I refine to be lamp oil), that the future world will be fueled by using alternative energy (I define to be anything but the former)." bound to win, when betting the winnings on each outcome of income; each acquisition dignifies again the invention of progress, with each negatively logical speculation continuing that with every loss. there must be a profit.
it is funny that we value the future over the past when evaluating the present as the source and gauge of wealth, when in sight of everything but ourselves being worthy. diamonds and fossil fuels, the condensed pre-history of life. we can't seem to put the past behind us, without destroying it to make a future out of the present. like nothing exists, unless needed and orphans exist although not unwanted.
.
